Archive | June, 2009

THE POLITICS OF PERMANENT 9-DAY WONDERS

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

Republic Of The Unresponsible

Town is rife with zeppo. Who has files on whom; who downloaded what and who have what, where.  The cocktail circuit is abuzz and entertained with the follies and foibles of others. Chatter abounds on personal, professional and political indiscretions of every kind. But in the midst of the enveloping awfulness that passes for public life,  rises the sinking feeling that, in this Republic of the Unresponsible, nothing is about to change. Unless….
For our sins, Father Charles has far more than the cross of plagiarism to bear. He is indeed the Chosen One- selected to symbolize the comprehensive corruption of our condition. It may be too much to ask, but we need Father Charles to rise above his own humiliation and hurt to see himself as an instrument of our redemption. How ironic that the one man so universally hailed as the expression of our highest values and trust, should so spectacularly stumble and fall, taking down with him our confidence in recognizing truth from untruth.
We already know what it says about Father Charles—that in this land, not even the priest can cast the first stone. The question now is: what does it say about us and our capacity for judgment and insight and our ability to sift the substance of wheat from the veneer of chaff?
The values that prefer chaff  are expressed in the very fabric of the topsy-turvy world we’re crafting. It’s in our disdain for agriculture as an elemental condition of independence; it’s in our ignorance of the environmental space as a defining factor in the options for development and  sustenance; it’s in our penchant for positions and titles and in our willingness to buy cat in bag, repeatedly seduced by the purveyors of our own demise.
“Celebrants at our own funeral” was the image evoked by poet Leroy Clarke in describing a people unaware of their own participation in the disaster unfolding right before them.
Relentlessly and inexorably, it seems, we’re caught in a current of forces beyond even our understanding, far less control. Oblivious to reality, we surrender to the tide pushing us, mindlessly moving from episode to episode. Consider some of the highlights of the five months of this year: CL Financial collapse; Finance Minister in a vice; belt tightening; Summit miseries; UDeCOTT’s Pandora Box; Integrity Commission implosion; Presidential ineptitude; AG’s submission of surrender; Opposition instability; violence…
In this climate of permanent nine-day wonders, headline writers are out of words while high decibels of outrage are reduced to mere ambient noise. How many times can “fiasco” be used before it becomes just another six-letter word? And so, our impotence deepens.
How fitting then that, like the priest who has been chosen as the expression of our comprehensive corruption, the expression of our complete impotence is none other than the occupier of the highest office in the land.
President Max Richards should be spared our self-righteous indignation. Of course, he should resign- and, like the British Speaker, one imagines he would do so in an ordered world of representative politics. In this frontier territory without rules, no one is more trapped than President Richards. He is as unable to resign as he was unable to execute the appointment of an Integrity Commission. Like everyone else, the best he can hope for is the arrival of some other nine-day wonder to claim the spotlight and put him out of his misery.
And so it will… or will it?
As we consider the lot of future generations, it is unthinkable that Trinidad and Tobago will not find the wisdom and courage to stop the tide and turn it around. Surely by now, the children of the enslaved and indentured have quenched the thirst for revenge on history and are ready to face the task of nation-building.

After almost 50 years, the urgency of meeting the demands of independence  is upon us. There is no escape and no short cuts. Not even the blessings of oil and gas can save us. The condition of permanent violence is already here along with the consequences of massive under-education even among the most-schooled and social disintegration. The responsibility for changing course is ours. We can no longer spectate. Massa Day long done and we’re no longer slaves watching the great house burn. Today, the great house is, in fact, ours.
The requirement for full participation in the service of nation-building demands that we each review our individual relationship with this place and with each other. Each of us is summoned to the task of Politics, expressed as private initiative for the public good. The notion of being “above politics” must be dismissed as the mere convenient cover for opportunism that it is.
It will take real politics to negotiate our way to acceptable terms on which we could ultimately agree to live and prosper, together, in this republic.

Comments (0)

RUGBY BRETHREN…

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

From That Other Bayshore, Across the Train Line

By Lorraine Waldropt

In Marabella, just off the main road, there is a small village called Bayshore known by most as the notorious “Train Line”.
Famous for its bad boys and fair share of newspaper headlines, this is not the Bayshore of the well-heeled north west. There are no luxury towers and condos here, but shanty shacks not mansions. Not your ideal hangout spot if you can’t lime with the fellas on the block and keep a cool head when crowds scatter with the sound of a siren. But while  Train Line may not be your Westwood Park, there is a silver lining in the stormy village- the Rainbow rugby team.
And again, the stereotype of middle class men playing a tough tackling ‘hooligan’ sport, does not fit.
The dreadlocked Marabella men are breaking boundaries and lifting hearts through a sport that …
In the 2008 local rugby season, Rainbow made a clean steal of the National Seven’s title and secured silver medals in the Men’s Championship Division. They are not the ones to knock glasses in classy clubhouses and sing the All Black’s Hacker tune (the popular rugby chant introduced by the New Zealand Rugby Team). God forbid! Their clubhouse, if you could call it that, is the centre street in their village! But their success story of rising out of poverty and social ills through the vehicle of one of T&T’s minority sport is worthy of several toasts. Nobody can attest to this more than Rainbow founder and coach, Rudolph Jack.
As he recounted the journey from the club’s humble beginnings, through its reformative powers on the village and to the raving rewards it reaps today, Jack’s face softened with a smile, even as  his eyes told a tale of hardship and pain that, perhaps, only time and more medals might heal:
“The Train Line today is a rugby village. Everybody plays with the team now. It wasn’t always so, things change now thanks to rugby. In the early days the village had a bad rep, we still do because you can’t change everything and everybody. You see, life still hard, we still on the bread line but sport has transformed our thinking into a more positive one, it gives us new hope.”
In 1985, Jack pulled together his team of ruggermen, tired of having to make the long trip into Port of Spain to play with Harvards Rugby Team.
“I left Harvards and started my own club so that I could train closer to home. I called it Rainbow because in the Bible God promised his children of Israel a rainbow after the floods as a sign that all was well,” he explained.
Rugby was Jack’s rainbow, a sign of better things to come as he quit the worldly life with the birth of his first son and began to pursue his rugby dream. “Rainbow started off real small, we didn’t have many resources. As you know people on the train line don’t have riches, our lives are simple. We used to play barefooted and wear different colour jerseys because we couldn’t even afford a uniform. But God sent help to us through good Samaritans,” he said.
These Samaritans included English teams- Rugby Club Birkenhead who sponsored uniforms and boots in 1995, and, at home, the Liat Sevens and Esculpians Rugby Club who donated jerseys that team members still wear. “They (Esculpians) offered me a trip to England but I invested the money into Rainbow instead,” said Jack.
As the years progressed, Rainbow grew in strength and in numbers, still a modest bunch plagued by adversities of poverty and crime stigmas. Still, the Rainbow ruggermen stuck it out, gradually emerging as “the team to watch” on the rugby pitch, not only because they stood out in the fraternity with their Rastafarian dreadlocks, barefooted tactics and colourful uniform but because of the bold statement of their playing style, infused as it was by the Rastafarian spirit of brethren and camaraderie. Their reputation drew visiting rugby players by the numbers. While locals dared not trespass the gates of the Marabella train line, many a team from the UK and the US valiantly ventured down to Rainbow’s “living room” – the living room being nothing more than a cleared spot on the main street of the village.
With a rising cadre of  players ranging from ages five to fifty, the Rainbow camp became a feeding ground for both Senior and Junior National Teams, while grooming, nurturing and sending forth a mixture of skill and experience to the various national rugby teams. Rugby greats such Ronald Silverton (who now plays for Caribs Rugby Team), David Straker who played with both National and West Indies Rugby Teams, Matthew Marine, the late Kern Charles, Anton Celestine and Mark Hamilton were among those.
“Mark Hamilton was in YTC (Youth Training Centre) and he used Rainbow rugby as a means of reformation. My nephew Ronald Silverton and my son, Kidane Silverton (who plays for the National and West Indies Rugby Teams) and my younger son, Themba Jack are all very strong players,” Jack declared with pride.
“Good things come those who wait and have hope,” he observed. “And we certainly have paid our dues in life; many rewards lie at the end of our Rainbow.” Many rewards indeed as just last year, the Rainbow found its pot of gold in an invitation to Touraid, a charitable World Rugby Tour for underprivileged youths. Players from as far as India, Ivory Coast and Madagascar converged in England to play against each other.  For the 2008 leg, Rainbow’s Under 13 team stepped up to the challenge, facilitated by Olympic Committee Secretary and National Rugby Federation Secretary, Brain Lewis.
“Brian Lewis was the wheel that started the tour idea in motion. This opportunity was the best for our boys. It was the first time some of them had ever travelled and they had so much fun,” said Jack. In the tournament which was staged in Surrey, England, the Rainbow Youth Team was privileged enough  to rub shoulders with International Rugby icons, Danny Cipriani, a Trinidad-born player in England, the Armitage brothers, also of Trinidadian descent and South African Rugby champion, Chester Williams.  The boys left an indelible mark on the tournament, playing at a high standard and representing Trinidad and Tobago and the Train Line to the fullest. Rainbow’s impact was so great that the team was featured on International News Network, BBC.
“I used to fight and beat up people in school but rugby changed me. When I started playing I didn’t have time to do bad things. Going to England was like a dream come true. I still can’t believe I went so far! My whole life is rugby now- I watch it on TV, I train, I play, I am happy I joined the sport,” confessed 12 year-old Kelson Williams who had travelled as part of the Touraid contingent.
“I saw where the Queen lives and that was the biggest thing for me- after the rubgy, that is,” professed Themba Jack who played the position of fly half for the tour. Another youth player, Jeron Pantor has found new inspiration since the tour. “I want to become an engineer, one day,” said the young full back, whose sister, brother and father play rugby as well.
Currently, Rainbow has more developmental initiatives on the agenda which are well on the way. A Youth Development/Rugby Community Road show with the University of Trinidad and Tobago travelling to rural communities, mentoring youths; a church sponsored personally by the Mayor of San Fernando; a youth educational centre supported by the counselor for the area; a ladies rugby team and a pending trip to Mexico for 2010.
“Rugby is a second chance for everybody on the Train Line. It was for me; I wasn’t no saint but I made a change. I see this same change happening with the youths we now have on the team. Some of them have no food, no clothes but we try to provide these things to them in rugby. But as our membership extend we need finances to cover our costs,” said Jack.
“Sport can be a substitute for crime. You see, what we have to understand is that some people resort to crime as a livelihood when things get hard. But if this need can be met with sport and other positive options, then and only then T&T crime rates will decrease,” he concluded.

Comments (0)

Social stratification in Trinidad, 2K0ax

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

By Kevin Baldeosingh

Lloyd Braithwaite

Lloyd Braithwaite

The fire-coloured flyer from the University of Trinidad and Tobago (UTT) announced a symposium on “Social and ethnic stratification in contemporary Trinidad and Tobago”. The discussion, which took place on May 7 at the National Library, was based on sociologist Lloyd Braithwaite’s seminal 1953 work Social Stratification in Trinidad, and the flyer explained that “In the years since that study was done, much has happened to alter the demographic landscape of Trinidad and Tobago. This is particularly the case in respect of the Indo-Trinidadian population which did not feature in Braithwaite’s analysis.” And, it promised in red letters, the symposium would “re-examine Braithwaite’s paradigm”.
This turned out to be false advertising, however, so it’s a good thing that only 50 people showed up for the talk.
The four panellists were political analyst Selwyn Ryan, sociologist Roy McCree, feminist Rhoda Reddock, and attorney-at law Dawn Seepersad. Ryan, who chaired the panel, explained that Seepersad had no sociological background, but he had spoken to her at a dinner party and “thought she had some interesting things to say.” In the following week, letter-writer Sheila Bedeau of Tacarigua would complain that a panel on such a topic should have been more ethnically representative and ask why persons like Anne-Marie Bissessar, John La Guerre, Kirk Meighoo, Ralph Premdass, or Raymond Ramcharitar had not been included.
In any case, none of the panellists fulfilled what you’d think would be the basic purpose of such a symposium: to explain how the society had changed in the half-century since Braithwaite did his research. McCree, who did at least make some general comments on the ethnic changes in class structure and urban rankings, asserted that a lack of data made an update difficult. This seems unlikely, given reports from the Central Statistical Office such as the 1997 Household Budgetary Survey, the 2000 Population and Housing Census, the Labour Force Report 2006, to say nothing of documents from other sources such as the 2005 Survey of Living Conditions and the 2008 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. Reddock proffered some theoretical ideas, such as “ethnic dualism”, and claimed that the two major developments shaping social structure since Braithwaite were the 1970 Black Power movement and economic neo-liberalism. Neither theories nor assertions were supported by any empirical data. I don’t know if anything more came in the discussion after McCree and Reddock spoke, because after getting so little in one hour I figured it was time to leave the library’s Audio-Visual room.
Nonetheless, the idea behind the symposium was a good one. Braithwaite’s little study was the first attempt to create a rigorous (rather than imaginative) social portrait of Trinidad, and it provides a useful lens to analyse the society from a long perspective. I cannot take up all Braithwaite’s observations because I’d end up writing a monograph myself, so I have instead extracted some of his key comments and examined the data to see how things have changed (or not) in the ensuing decades.
Let’s start with Braithwaite’s fundamental assertion about Trinidad stratification: “[The coloured middle-class] would rank the ethnic groups in order of superiority and inferiority in an order such as this:- 1. White 2. Coloured 3. Black 4. Indian 5. Portuguese 6. Syrian”.  In the 21st century, this no longer holds true from any perspective. Indeed, even in 1950 Braithwaite noted that “individuals from the Chinese, the Syrian and the Indian groups are, in that order, breaking into the lower fringes of white society.”  So now, measured by economic position, the SLC states that “groups such as Chinese, Syrian/Lebanese and Caucasians that together accounted for less than one percent of the sample, were all among the non-poor.”
Popular perception has for some time held that Indo-Trinidadians are economically better off than Afro-Trinidadians, but the data provide no solid confirmation of this. The HBS shows little difference in the average household income of households headed by Afro-Trinis or Indo-Trinis, while my own analysis of (unadjusted) figures from the CSO for ethnicity and income found that 42 percent of Afro-Trinis had monthly incomes below $3000 as compared to 49 percent of Indo-Trinis. (However, the SLC says that, compared to Africans, “Indians had a lower percentage representation among the indigent, the poor and the vulnerable than was their representation in the population.”) The proportion of middle-income persons in both groups is about equal (10%), as is the ratio of wealthy persons (1%). The largest proportion of high-income individuals (over $15,000 per month) within their ethnic groups are Syrian-Lebanese and Chinese (14%) and white (21%). So, economically, whites have retained their dominant position. But they are no longer socially superior in politics or culture.
In Braithwaite’s time, complexion and class were closely linked. “The middle-class consisted predominantly of coloured people, that is of light-skinned and brown-skinned people, while the lower class consisted predominantly of black,” he wrote. This is still so to some extent, but not to the degree where a dark complexion prevents social advancement (though, in the case of light skin, it may help do so, especially for women). Afro-Trinis, who make up 37 percent of the populace according to the 2000 census, account for 29 percent of legislators, senior officials, and managers. Indo-Trinis, who form 40 percent of the populace, make up half of this occupational group. In the time of his study, Braithwaite wrote, “The establishment of coloured persons in the professions was easy because the bulk of the population was coloured and therefore there was no racial barrier to patronage.” Now, among professionals, Indo-Trinis are over-represented at 49 percent, and Afro-Trinis equitably at 38 percent. And in the elementary occupations, Indo-Trinis are slightly less represented (35%) against Afro-Trinis (38%).
These marginal differences have created an exaggerated perception of Indo success. This is partly because of the visibility of Indo-Trinis in high-status positions: they own and control about 20 percent of businesses, as compared to 10 percent of Afro-Trinis; over 60 percent of law firms are Indo-owned; and almost 80 percent of doctors are Indo. Also, Indo students take about two-thirds of national scholarships every year. This apparent superiority has created a backlash from Afro demagogues, who try to explain Indo success in terms of cheating – corruption in Common Entrance, according to calypsonian Cro Cro; biased entry requirements to the Mount Hope Medical School, according to literature professor Selwyn Cudjoe; and price-gouging by doubles vendors, according to PNM Government Ministers.
Yet the average Indo and Afro are on par economically and educationally, so Indo success involves only a small percentage of that group. There is, however, one significant difference between the Afro-Trinis and Indo-Trinis: marriage. Although half the population of  T&T is classified as Never Married, Indo-Trinis have a marriage rate of one in two, as compared to Afro-Trinis whose marriage rate is one in three. Braithwaite had written that “Marriage is on the whole relatively successful, but even in unsuccessful unions there does not seem to be a steady recourse to the divorce court.” This is still the case today, with only one in seven marriages ending in divorce.
Nonetheless, the greater marriage rates among Indo-Trinis will, for a variety of reasons, probably lead to better outcomes for their children. The SLC notes that “Common-law and visiting unions were more likely in the lower quintiles, and formal marriage was associated with improved socio-economic status.” This implies that marriage creates a perception of higher status, even if economic levels are on par. Braithwaite wrote that “Of even greater interest is the high rate of population increase and the differential fertility rates that exist between the Negro and Indian groups.” Back then, the birth rates were 33 per 1000 for the populace as a whole, but 46 per 1000 for Indians. Two generations onward, the birth-rate has dropped considerably for both groups, and is now a mere 14 per 1000 persons. Braithwaite was thus wrong when he wrote that, due to Roman Catholic and Hindu beliefs, “There is little likelihood, therefore, in the context of Trinidad society that there will develop in the near future any movement based on the advocacy of birth control.”

If there’s one thing that hasn’t changed in the past half-century, however, it is the Trini elites’ idea of superiority. “The tendency is towards conspicuous consumption, towards accumulating as many as possible of the external marks which will win recognition from other people,” Braithwaite observed, even as future PNM leader Patrick Manning was running about in short pants. “In the intellectual field this showed itself in the desire to accumulate degrees quite apart from their intrinsic worth. One individual, for example, got a correspondence BA from a phoney institution in the United States but was willing and able to parade it.” In the 21st century, pastors parade their bogus PhDs and are allowed to open their own secondary schools.
And, finally, the highest in the land has stayed exactly the same: “There was always a tendency to lay the blame for any mistakes of policy, not on the Governor, but on his local advisors,” wrote Braithwaite; and he was also a former principal of the University of the West Indies.

Comments (0)

THE VIEW FROM SEVENTY-SIX

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

By IAN McDONALD

With shocking quickness, another year has gone by in a blur and I am suddenly seventy-six. As Robert Frost wrote in one of his lucid, straight-speaking poems, the challenge increasingly is “what to make of a diminished thing”. Well, at least one can attempt an honest appraisal.
First of all, the senses have grown a little dulled. The beauty of this wild world does not seem so fresh. The shocks of beauty dealt by even the most ordinary things - cloud shadows passing over savannahs, the play of sunlight on a silver river, the smell of rain on sun-burned grass - these simple shocks of loveliness no longer strike with the singular and heart-stopping force of years ago.
The grand dreams of youth long ago faded. The ambition to beat the world and win Wimbledon which drove one to countless practice hours in the sun was never achieved - though it led, at least, to a lot of fun and friends and frolic on the way. The desire to be the greatest poet the world has ever seen has not, sad to say, been accomplished. Rather smaller ambitions like being Prime Minister of the whole West Indies were not, for some reason, fulfilled. Such is life. One has grown much wearier, snowy haired, much slower. The drive to be famous has for a long time seemed far less important than it did once upon a time - if only because the stars one aimed at so fervently were soon seen to be cold or fiery places where it was most uncomfortable to be. Ambition is a dusty business. One comes to know very well that in the end the bones of kings and beggars will jostle equally in the same unambitious earth.
Of course, much remains. The sense of the world’s great beauty has not been stilled. Not long ago up the Essequibo the rising sun built castles in the sky as magical as any I remember that used to tear my heart in pieces in my youth. And the simple beauties of the green and flower-filled, bird-bejewelled garden my wife has created is a constant, vivid joy.
A sense of humour, a sense of proportion in all things, seem to me more precious than they once did. After all, we are only little under the stars. We, and all our deadly serious concerns, are really not all that desperately important.  I am surer now than I ever was that we should cultivate the habit of laughing at ourselves when we show the first signs of growing pompous or bad-tempered or over-critical of others.
As one grows older, two opposing inclinations contend. The first is to relax, withdraw completely from the hurly-burly, take a rest before the night of the long journey. The other inclination still remains a little stronger in me, I don’t know for how much longer. It is summed up in Sheila Wingfield’s good poem about the Chinese Emperor, Hsuang-Tsung:

“Hsuang Tsung, great emperor,
Giddy, and ill and old, carried in a litter,
Saw the stars sway.
His conquests and his arguments,
And his powers, falling into fever with himself,
Pulsed their lives away.
Bow to his shade. To be at rest is but a dog
That sighs and settles: better
The unrelenting day.”

Perhaps above all, I have been strengthened over the years in one particular certainty and one belief. This is very simply that the brotherhood of all men is not just a high-sounding cliché, but a real thing to cling to in the various turns and twists that human relationships take in life. Prejudice against any man because of class, creed, or colour really is despicable. Archibald MacLeish’s poem of the astronaut seeing the world whole and entire for the first time says it well:

“To see the earth as it truly is,
small and blue and beautiful
in that eternal silence where it floats,
is to see ourselves as riders on the earth together
brothers on that bright loveliness in that eternal cold
brothers who know now that they are truly brothers.”

Inevitably, I think of death more than I used to do. This may seem morbid - friends often reprove me for writing too much about death - but it is not really so. It does not get in the way of enjoying life every day. Indeed, it gives a sharper edge of meaning and beauty to every moment spent - like in good company tasting for the first time that delightful Hungarian plum liqueur at dinner recently. When there are fewer of anything - like moments of time - they become more valuable.  This is not to say that I do not hate the thought of my death. It will be such a waste. I once read a poem by John Updike, the great American writer whose poem sequence Endpoint, which he wrote just before he died, is the first poetic masterpiece of the 21st century. That earlier poem captures a sense of what is lost when anyone dies.

Perfection Wasted

And another regrettable thing about death
is the ceasing of your own brand of magic,
which took a whole life to develop and
market -
the quips, the witticisms, the slant
adjusted to a few, those loved ones nearest
the lip of the stage, their soft faces blanched
in the footlight glow, their laughter close to
tears,
their tears confused with their diamond
earrings.
their warm pooled breath in and out with
your heartbeat,
their response and your performance
twinned,
The jokes over the phone. The memories
packed
in the rapid access file. The whole act.
Who will do it again? That’s it: no one;
imitators and descendants aren’t the same.

Who will do it again? Not the same for sure. It is inexplicable why again and again and again so much interesting and valuable experience is allowed to accumulate and then what - relocated? I regret that is most unlikely.

Comments (0)

New Amnesty, Old Attitude

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

Caricom Unity, A Dream Deferred

By Annalee Davis Bridgetown, Barbados

On Tuesday, May 6th 2009, Prime Minister David Thompson politely informed Parliament of the policy determined by the Subcommittee on Immigration set up in June 2008.  Non-nationals have one month to turn themselves into Immigration to regularize their status or be “removed” from December 1 2009.
We might respectfully remind our leaders to adhere to the spirit of the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas, be cognizant of the human element within Treaty negotiations and be aware of the contributions of the region’s working people and their lived reality.
On Monday, May 11th, I accompanied a friend to the Immigration Department.  Her Immigrant application was submitted two years ago, she was interviewed eighteen months ago and her stamp was due to expire that week.
While waiting, a gentleman told me he has resided in Barbados for fifteen years.  One of his two children writes the Common Entrance Examination in 2010.  Status still pending, Immigration said he needs another Medical Examination.  “Send me back to St. Vincent”, he told them, refusing to comply.
My friend exited from the cubicle.  The officer told her of chaos in the Immigration Department, that personnel were shifted to stamp out corruption and that many people will be deported back home.  She kindly advised my friend to have a Plan B.  Apparently, work permits can be ‘purchased’ for BDS$20,000.00 (US$10,000.00) and for a price, one can even marry a dead Bajan.
Although the Prime Minister has converted the five year amnesty into an eleven and half year amnesty, which will entail the voluntary and forced return of most CARICOM nationals residing in Barbados, he states his commitment to regional integration, in particular Article 45, that allows for the free movement of all nationals within the community.
Where is the evidence of his commitment?  Is it in the raids at the bus stand and nightclubs where CARICOM nationals are handcuffed and deported? Or, as Rickey Singh asked, do we see a commitment to regional integration when CARICOM nationals respond to official notices, asking them to collect passports or attend interviews, only to be deported?
This new ‘Amnesty’ has evoked much discussion. Some criticise the PM for focusing on illegal CARICOM nationals only, while others blame migrants for taking jobs, taking local men/women, squatting, polluting the nation’s water, committing crimes, smuggling drugs, engaging in prostitution and burdening our nation in their thousands.
The truth is that the vast majority of CARICOM nationals in Barbados are not criminals, murderers or thieves. Many work seven days a week, improving their lives while supporting extended families back home.  Notably, they struggle on their own without any institutional framework where they might seek advice or lodge a complaint.
One construction worker told me he claimed dependents while filing his Barbadian taxes. He was told he could not claim, because they do not live here.  He replied that he was not allowed to bring his family here but he still supported them.  He cooks, cleans and launders his clothes while working seven days a week.  His wife raises the children back home without husband or father.  The tax officer told him to keep quiet because he might be required to pay back taxes on previous claims.  He stays quiet, out of fear.
Is this commitment to the regional integration process?
For those migrants who cannot ‘pass’ for being Bajan, there are other humiliations.  The Indo-CARICOM migrant is exposed to verbal abuse on the bus and in the supermarket, and in some instances, is being spat on while walking the streets.
All of this begs the question, outside of geographic terms, how inclusive is the term ‘Caribbean’ when some of us feel more or less legitimate than others?  And when do migrants become something other than unacceptably high in their numbers, mere units of labour or a statistic in an official report about providers of remittances?  What will it take for us to see the migrant as a human being with dreams for a better life?  Where is the compassion for our Caribbean brothers and sisters?
If PM Thompson wants to protect the migrants from abuse, instead of doubling the amnesty, he might consider reverting to the humane five-year policy while implementing contingent rights, and encouraging signatories to the Treaty to do likewise.  Instead of being complicit in the breakdown of the family unit, he might extend the right to move to immediate family members of migrant workers.  The PM might also consider dialoguing with a newly formed Barbadian organization campaigning for a more humane immigration policy.
PM Thompson’s budget last Monday had several Bible quotes.  Missing was the one about “love your neighbour as yourself”.  Maybe that doesn’t fit into the “Team Barbados” concept we are all to adopt while working to build a stronger nation.
Sadly, this dilemma is not peculiar to Barbados.  Insularity, xenophobia and fear of the “other” are rampant throughout the region.  The region aspires to the philosophy ‘Team Nation’.  We are flag waving entities, independent and separate.  Wave your flag!
At the Heads of Government Conference in February 2007, leaders decided we would achieve full free movement by the end of 2009.  That’s six months away, taking us to December 1 2009, when the Thompson administration will start ‘removing’ illegal CARICOM nationals en masse.  So much for that decision!
My colleague from a Caribbean Single Market Economy (CSME) unit told me “unfortunately, I don’t think that the non- implementation of the 2007 decision will result in any protests, because in most countries we have encountered the same fears as in Barbados.  In Antigua and Barbuda we were told bluntly that they don’t want the Community to add new categories.  Furthermore our NGO’s are having the same bias as the rest of their community, so they will not protest either.  Work on contingent rights is progressing slowly, because Member States are concerned about cost and capacity factors.”
Lloyd Best said that we have all been transplanted from many places and forced into the straitjacket of slavery, indentureship and colonialism and the most important thing for us to do is to find a home, find a community and found a community.  The Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas, signed by fourteen CARICOM countries, was in theory a move towards building our regional home.
Tragically, our leaders don’t see it as their responsibility to nurture regional consciousness, encouraging CARICOM nationals to develop a sense of regional belonging.
Given recent developments, maybe we should revise the revised Treaty, get rid of that vexing Article 45.  Stop raising the hopes and dreams of these poor bastards who toil from sun up to sun down, building hotels, cleaning toilets, serving drinks.
Let’s be honest, we don’t want to be a community.  Hail - Team Barbados!  Team Jamaica!  Team Trinidad!
And what of Team Caribbean?  You can find that on a page in your daughter’s school atlas.  Tell her it’s a theoretical concept. Pure rhetoric.  Not grounded in anything factual.  Just emotive banter.
(Annalee Davis is a Barbadian Visual Artist, living and working in Barbados on a series of forty-five artistic projects that investigate the impact and anxieties of intra-regional Caribbean immigration.  Please view www.creole-chant.blogspot.com to complete the questionnaire if you have a migratory experience you would like to share or www.annaleedavis.com to see her work.)
—Courtesy Stabroek News

Comments (0)

BIM, BEM AND BHADASE

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

By Tony Deyal

“Bim” and “Bam” are like Dumb and DOMA, Trinidadianisms for a pair of stumblers and bumblers, grumblers and mumblers. Yet Bim was also a movie about a Trinidad politician played by an actor who later became a Minister of Government in the PNM and then the UNC administrations.  Significantly, the Minister, Ralph Maraj, made his acting debut in a play, “Called To The Bar” which won all the awards in the very early years of the Secondary Schools Drama Festival held at the Naparima Bowl.
A 1976 review of BIM, the movie, by Vincent Canby of the New York Times, describes its central theme, “It’s the story of Bim (Ralph Maraj), a young Trinidadian of East Indian descent whose father was the autocratic leader of the sugar workers union. After his father is murdered by rivals, Bim is sent off to live in Port of Spain, where he experiences the prejudice of black Trinidadians for the first time and turns to a life of petty crime. Eventually, in about five minutes of film time, Bim succeeds his father as a union power. It becomes something of an anti-climax after all this, then, when Bim’s undoing results not from crime, politics, ambition, black rivalries or independence. Once he gets to the top, Bim starts to drink, neither well nor wisely.”  Canby’s verdict was, “Yet it’s not dull, and it regards Trinidad’s racial problems and political aspirations in a way that is unsentimental to the point of being merciless.”
What made the film doubly memorable for me was that the theme song, written by Andre Tanker, was “Carapichaima” – the name of the village in which I spent my infant years. Also, my uncle “Bem” ran a gambling club that posed sometimes as a “parlour” across the road from Sonny Boy’s shop which was on the corner of the railway station road across the street from the big cistern which, up to today, is the stage for a very special Carnival experience. I made my debut on that stage at the age of six, playing “Captain Kidd”, a robber, and then walking across to my Uncle Bem’s club where a Bat enfolded me in his arms and I cried, screamed and ran home.  Captain Jack Sparrow would have ordered me hanged, drawn and quartered for cowardice in the face of the enemy.  However, my Uncle Bem laughed and went back to the “whappie” game he was “casa-ing”.
Bem, my father, and my Uncle Jacket (a.k.a.) “Pittiman” (combination of “petit”—French for “small”—and “man” but pronounced as “pity-man”), had one very important link to Bim—they loved their liquor. I have always ascribed it to their growing up in the cane fields where from the age of five they had to dig paragrass (Brachiara mutica) which is a weed found in cane-growing areas.  Paragrass has been described as an aggressive invader of human-altered habitats.  In that way it resembled the estate owners and their successors.  My father, many of my family, never got to go to school. They did men’s work in the cane fields, got children’s pay (about six cents to a shilling a week) and started hitting the puncheon rum early.
There was also another link which I was not fully aware of at the time but which evolved as I grew up.  Carapichaima was a sugar-cane village.  Nearly everyone had some kind of connection with “the estate”.  It was not one estate —there was Wyaby, McBean, even distant Brechin Castle.  There were also Felicity, Woodford Lodge, Phoenix Park and Exchange.  My Uncle Jacket and all my other family worked like hell during the crop time and unless they were favoured by the “driver”—a title that persisted beyond slavery—or the overseer, or the “boss” who was always a white man, they had no work during the wet season except maybe a “two-days” weeding.  Fortunately, when they were not drinking rum, they kept cows, planted rice and some vegetables, and also reared chickens, ducks and the occasional goat.  Because your pay in those days was directly related to how much sugar the estate produced, a cane fire would rouse the entire village- people risked their lives to save the precious stalks.
But there were other fires within the system that even as the men “fired one” in the rumshops were beginning to ignite. Politics and Trade Unionism were becoming very important to them all.  I only learned about Adrian Cola Rienzi much later.  In the village, the perennial politician, Ramoutar Dass, who lived next to the cinema, used to pass around the village with his loudspeaker exhorting us all to vote for him, handing out “pamphlets” which we collected.  But he was a bit player in the evolving Carapichaima.  Even as our neighbour across the street, Siewdass Sadhu, built his “cootya” or temple by the sea, and his sons, my cousin Joe (Uncle Jacket’s son) and I played cricket in the empty lot next door, the situation was getting hotter.
There was always a comical element to the politics of the time.  Ramoutar’s last name and his “loser” image were easy targets.  Dass was not Kapital and the only marx on his ballot paper were from his wife and maybe one or two other people.  He was almost like Niles, the Point Fortin politician, who only got one vote- so he went home and beat his wife.  Ranjit Kumar, whose memory is now much esteemed and who in retrospect is a paragon (although in club cricket terms his behavior was more like that of a “wanderer” or even a “comet”), came to Carapichaima and environs hoping to catch the Indian vote.  He made the usual promises including telling the people of Roopsingh Road that as an engineer and an honest man he would ensure that they got running water.  This is a promise that even now can cause the votes to flow since there are still many communities without running water.  Sure enough, a truck came and (to use a phrase popularized in the dialogue between Kamla Persad-Bissessar and Ganga Singh) “dropped pipe”.  The people of Roopsingh Road, their dream of showers and running water having come to pass, voted for Ranjit Kumar.  The day after the election, what came to pass was the same truck which took back all the pipes.  For a long time the people of Roopsingh Road were so incensed that, had they caught up with Ranjit, he would have got a lot of taps from them.
My Uncle Jacket indulged me.  He would pull me up on the horse he rode home, pick me up and put me to sit in front of him.  He laughed when I tried to make a joke.  He took me to cricket when I was five.  I had a broken leg and he took me to the doctor on his bicycle.  This is how, when the other Maharaj, not Ralph or Bim but Bhadase Sagan Maharaj came to Carapichaima to talk politics and trade unionism, my Uncle Jacket took me to the meeting.
We were all standing around this big man wearing a light brown shirt, dark brown pleated trousers with the fold at the ankle, a brown Wilson hat and, something I had never seen before, a gold watch that was shining in the light from the Coleman gas-lamp.  I nudged my Uncle and asked in awe, “Dat is Bhadase?”  It is the first and only time my Uncle ever got angry with me.  He slapped me and said sharply, “Mr. Bhadase!  Dat is Mr. Bhadase!”  It reminded me of an incident much later when Nelson Mandela came to Jamaica and the Government then named a Highway after him—the Nelson Mandela Highway.  After a few days, someone who was obviously incensed that the Government had not demonstrated “nuff” respected, painted the letters “Mr” in front of the name on the highway sign.
After Mr. Bhadase we’ve seen Mr. Rampartap (Singh) and Mr. Basdeo (Panday).  In the epilogue, Mr. Ralph Maraj ended his political and movie career and was last seen somewhere in Whitehall.  Mr. Bhadase Sagan Maharaj and Dr. Eric Williams became buddies at the end, united against Black Power. Wyaby, McBean and all the other estates ended up as part of Caroni (1975) Ltd. which also ended but not in Felicity and has no hope of rising from the ashes of Phoenix Park. And my Uncle Jacket ended up as a night watchman at the All Trinidad Sugar and General Workers Trade Union until his death.  Most of my family and some of the protagonists of my story died from diabetes – you could say that in the end, one way or the other, the sugar got them.

*Tony Deyal was last seen thinking that Andre Tanker was an extremely prescient person to be able to trace the transition from Ralph Maraj to Basdeo Panday musically from Bim to Ben Lion.

Comments (0)

Zeitgeist 2009

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

A Short Story By Edmund Narine

“Everybody blaming the government for crime, but nobody looking at what they as individuals doing about crime. Crime is not only the government problem, crime is everybody problem.” Peter Nemiah Muckup chaired the meeting. Dressed in big red Art Smart tailored shirt, he spoke loudly, as if to an audience in Woodford Square, and not to the four people, one woman and three men, who sat indignant, eager to hear Nemiah’s plan for combating crime in Gorilla Crescent, a small village on the outskirts of Port of Spain. Jacob Tacka, Nemiah’s tenant and father of nine, was moved to speak up.
“I addressing crime in my own way, Mr. Chairman. But I ain’t getting help from the government. In fact, instead of the government helping me up they helping me down. I cut Freddie ass for stealing four Julie Mango from Miss St. Rose, and you know what, is I the police come looking for. Child abuse they say! For straightening out a upcoming thief!”
“But Mr. Taka, you should understand the government’s position on child abuse. The government recognizes that a beaten child models his behavior on his beating parents, and so, generation after generation, instead of curbing their children’s behavior with licks, by beating the children the parents perpetuate the violence that we, even at this moment, are trying to cure.”
“Well said, Mr. Hardeed!” Chairman Nemiah tapped the table in agreement. His wife, Alice, the lone woman in the audience, clapped and murmured a half-dozen self-satisfying ‘Amens!’” Mr. Taka appeared bewildered. Like Mr. Forthright, Alice Muckup and Mr. Taka, Mr. Hardeed sat in the first row of five metal folding chairs with the other forty five empty seats at his rear.
“All I saying is that that is my little way of tackling crime; my contribution to solving this massive crime situation in Trinidad. ‘Bend the tree while it young.’ That is what the old people say. It was true yesterday and it is true today,” Mr. Taka said.
“I feel a different way,” Mr. Fortright said. He lived in the four bedroom house at the village entrance, the one with the high, white stucco wall crowned with blazing warratal rocks. He was a geologist, and to villagers that explained the unusual wall. “We should tackle crime from the bottom up and not from the top down as we are now doing.”
“Meaning what?” Chairman Nemiah said. “I mean, that is what we are doing here. The government fighting at the top and we fighting at the bottom, is that what you mean?”
“Yes and no. The government fighting, but they should fight different. Take for example the condition of mothers, especially young mothers, or the old people situation. I know resources are available for greater help. They should be treated much better.”
Mr. Hardeed stopped picking his teeth, a look of consternation upon his face. He had heard this defense before, what he described as liberal refuse fit only for the Labasse. “You mean the government should pamper people who instead of taking responsibility totally ignore it and then blame the government?” Mr. Hardeed said. He lived at Santa Rosa Heights and owned a haberdashery business on Charlotte Street. Scouting the constituency for occasions to meet and address groups of people, he had stumbled on Nemiah’s ‘Crime Watch’ meeting and arrived on time.
“You talking about young mothers or you talking about old people….?”
“Both, Mr. Forthright,” Mr. Hardeed snapped. He was a no-nonsense Tobagonian and a mirror image of the Diego Martin West Parliamentary representative whom he sought to replace. “Young mothers don’t have to get pregnant!” He swiveled in his seat and addressed Mr. Forthright directly. “They choose to get pregnant. For them responsibility is a four letter word. Do it and let somebody else take the responsibility, and that somebody else is the same government that the opposition beating up on like a Good Friday Bobolee and saying the government could do more.” He turned and addressed Chairman Nemiah. “The government building thousands of houses, you know, and they saying the Government should build more.”
“And what about old people?” Mr. Forthright wanted to know, disgust for Mr. Hardeed showing on his face.
“Well, old people is a horse of a different colour.”
Mr. Hardeed crossed his legs, straightened his tie and addressed Chairman Nemiah.
“You know, Mr. Chairman, you have people in this country that never lay a hand on a shovel?” he said with incredulity. “Never lay a hand on a shovel! Some play card, some sleep late, some smoke weed, all some do is drink rum – and thanks to this government some drinking whisky, drinking Double Dog like water today! They too proud to work.”
Mr. Hardeed paused. He eyeballed the participants for signs of agreement. And, except for Mr. Forthright, nodding heads told him he had it. He smirked and continued his diatribe against the poor.
“When you say “Work!” is like you cuss they mother, boy. Imagine that! Work for them is not pride in standing on one’s feet; work is a four letter word, something you do to them instead of something you do for them. And so after thirty, forty, fifty years they retire with nothing to show for it except nine children, nineteen grandchildren, and no pension. That is their fault, man.”
On Mr. Taka’s face bewilderment turned to outrage, a condition that once made him chop off the right hand of a man. “Mr. Chairman,” he said, “that sound like Mr. Hardeed talking to me and the nine children I make – I work! I pay rent! I feed my wife and children!”
Mr. Hardeed had blundered. He was at the meeting to praise the Prime Minister and defend the Government with the hope that the Prime Minister would hear of his efforts and choose him to be the candidate for the Diego Martin West constituency seat- a sure win for whomever the Prime Minister chose. Mr. Hardeed was apologetic. He uncrossed his legs and addressed Mr. Taka directly.
“You try, Mr. Taka, you try. You work hard. You take care of your family. I don’t mean people like you,” Mr. Hardeed blundered on.
“But that is all he can do,” Mr. Forthright moved to Mr. Taka’s defense. He had experienced the plight of the poor in Gorilla Crescent, the overcrowded houses, the lack of recreation, the nightly gunfire, and the early morning pickups of dead young black men. He had attended both Mr. Taka’s sons’ funerals and as a result had become acquainted with Mr. Taka’s seven surviving children.
“What you mean ‘I try,’ Mr. Taka said, anger welling up in his chest. He slammed the table.  “I could get real vex you know….”
“Mr. Chairman, we need to hear your crime fighting plan,” Mrs. Alice Muckup cut in and brought her husband, Chairman Nemiah, back to his purpose. Curious villagers now peered through the windows of the Community Centre. For them, meetings here were for the select few - a coterie of ruling party supporters.
“Thank you my dear wife for always advising her dear husband. Today, I expected about forty people, you know, seeing that crime is so severe and affecting everybody. But this small gathering, the five of us sitting and discussing here, is not the time and place to present what I consider a proper and workable plan. The Prime Minister is doing his part. He is hiring more police. He is building up the Army. We gone from one battalion to two. Maybe he will go to three and even four battalions. The Prime Minister buying fast patrol boats for the Coast Guard. He have a spy blimp, a real Crime Watch, in the sky. So he trying. He trying and we have to try too. But like I say, with only five people here, now is not the time to present my plan. So, I suggest that we meet again, with a promise that each one of us take on the task of bringing five people to the next meeting. And that is my plan for today,” he laughed. “Do I hear an Ayei?”
“Aye,” the quartet responded; and on that note Chairman Nemiah adjourned the meeting.
That evening Mary, one of the Muckup’s two children, the other, Rougian a police officer, visited her parents and narrated the woe in her life. That morning her man, Santos, had pitched her out for the twenty eleventh time, as Alice Muckup would later describe it. Along with her three small children, Mary had no place to go, except back to her parents’ home.
“But what about Santos’ mother house?” Alice Muckup demanded. “Is a five bedroom house she own in Macoya. How come she can’t accommodate you? Them three children is she son own, you know.”
“She say the children will break up she things and they cuss too much,” Mary said.
“What you mean they cuss too much?” Nemiah said and stopped filling his hops bread with smoked herring. “Them is small children. One is five, one is six, and one is one. What kinda cuss they could cuss?”
“Daddy they picking up cuss words from Santos. He don’t care what he tell me. He cussing A word, B word, C word, F word. He cuss every word in the book in front the children.”
Mary sat hunched over a bowl of corn flakes, tears rolling from her downcast eyes, her cheeks heavy, her make-up on her wash rag. She wiped her dripping nose and intermittently spooned corn flakes to her mouth. Six-year old, five-year old, and one-year old ignored their bowls of Quaker Oats and stared at their eating, weeping mother.
“So why you come back here? The last time you come we had bacchanal.” The family was seated in the kitchen – the adults at the table; the babies on the floor. “Santos threatened to kill your father. Now you expect we to go through that again?” Alice sugared Nemiah’s tea and placed it alongside his hops bread on the flowered plastic table cloth.
“Is we daughter,” Nemiah said in resignation.
“But where we will put her? This house have one bedroom, a living room and a kitchen. The adult children in this village adding they own room or building small-house in they parents’ yard, but we don’t have the space here. Rougian build up the downstairs and that is his home. So where will we put Mary and her three children?”
“Help me Ma, I don’t ever want to see Santos again,” Mary sobbed. For the twenty eleventh time, Alice remembered, Mary had said the same thing. In 1995 Mary was declared winner of the Gorilla Crescent beauty contest and was well on her way to contest the national Trinidad and Tobago beauty queen title when she became pregnant with her first child. In the beginning Alice had desperately tried to sabotage Mary and Santos’ romance. She went as far as to tell Mary the lie that Santos was a Buller Man. But even if she had told Mary that Santos was the man who had shot Richardson in his driveway, Mary would have continued the relationship.
“The last time you come you stayed six months. We don’t have space here. We don’t have a place to put you up. Go to Macoya.”
Nemiah listened grim-faced. He thought the time had come to deal with Santos; to deal with Santos the way the Trinidad and Tobago police dealt with gang leaders – kill him. He should kill Santos himself, or get somebody to do it. The man make big money as a drug lord. But instead of minding his children, he keep throwing them out like Kentucky fried chicken bones. I warn Mary you know. I warn her. But she break stick in she ears. Now she in trouble again, is me she looking to rescue her. Girl children don’t listen. I listen to my mother. She tell me learn a trade. My father take me to a pipe fitter and that is why today I working with WASA. I feel to chop up Santos like King fish. But what to do? Mary is my daughter. She is we own – with my grandchildren. Yes, I could pay to kill Santos, but violence is not my head. I leave Santos in the hands of God. God will deal with him.
“Alice, we have to take them in. Is we children - all four of them. We have to forget the past; we have to look to the future; we have to take them in.” He swallowed the last mouthful of Lipton. He belched and looked towards Alice for her reply.
“But Doodoo, we don’t have space.” Alice stood and whimpered to Nemiah. “These children will spread out in the living room like sausages dressed in pyjamas. Somebody bound to mash them, and if is you in your size twelve – they dead!” The remark broke the seriousness of the moment. The Muckups laughed, an infectious laugh that little Tina and Gerry caught. They too squealed with laughter. “You will mash them up, flatten out the sausages under the size twelve.” Alice laughed heartily, tears streaming down her face. “But I still say we don’t have space.”
“Yes we have space,” Nemiah insisted. He had found a solution to Mary’s problem and he laughed like a Whe Whe winner. “Yes we have space, right here!”
“Here?” Alice spit out the words like a bullet from Rougian’s Glock pistol.
“Yes, right here, in the backyard,” Nemiah said.
“You mean the two room house Taka renting?’
“Yes.”
“Taka house? That one?”
“Yes, the same house, the green paint house, the house with the galvanize paint green, yellow, and red; the house with the wife, husband and seven children. Taka have to go!”
“Nemiah, you crazy. You putting Taka out. We tenant who bringing in a little money to help you pay for the old car, have to go? Nemiah this is madness. This is massive madness.”
Mr. Taka had always considered himself Nemiah’s tenant for life. In fact Mr. Taka had never even considered moving up to a bigger and better house, or even to build a house of his own, or even to apply for one of the thousands of houses Mr. Hardeed said the Government was building. At any rate he could not build in Gorilla Crescent where, like Laventille, Morvant, Dundonald Hill, every scrap of land was occupied. In Gorilla Crescent young adults were adding rooms to their parents’ homes to house their families. He had counted forty two people living in the house next door. Two of his five sons had been shot dead. But he had reorganized his life, relocated, and now, with his wife and seven children at Gorilla Crescent, for the first time he had felt secure. His ten year jail sentence was behind him, and it did some good, it gave him rank, and secured him a permanent position in URP. He and his wife and children were happy, happy in their small, limited world at Gorilla Crescent. They had grown accustomed to this world. If scarcity of space was not a problem, so was scarcity of water and food. Mr. Taka would often mutter “This place is cramped.” He bought a bigger gold chain; but he never searched for a bigger house. He bought expensive sneakers; but he never searched for a bigger house. Gorilla Crescent was there, just like the Rose mango tree, and he loved it. He could smoke a joint and watch the Gru Gru Bouef palms float towards him and giggle. He knew his children would grieve to death if they had to give up the cloud-high Rose mango standing between his house and Nemiah’s. In fact his thoughts focused on the day when his children would grow up and like a flock of Martiniquan Sickia depart his house and head for the tallest Pomerac tree; then he and his wife would have the house to themselves.
But Mr. Nemiah thought differently. “I say Taka must go,” Mr. Nemiah said. “True, Taka does bring in a few dollars, but this is we flesh and blood. Taka have to go, and Taka have to go soon.”
NEXT MONTH: THE MEETING

Comments (0)

CARIBBEAN BUSINESS ROUND-UP

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO

Prime Minister Patrick Manning arrives for the Fifth Summit of the Americas at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Port of Spain. A statement trom The Office of the Prime Minister said the Government had spent over half a billion dollars—$508m—to host the Summit.

Prime Minister Patrick Manning arrives for the Fifth Summit of the Americas at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Port of Spain. A statement trom The Office of the Prime Minister said the Government had spent over half a billion dollars—$508m—to host the Summit.

• Interest rates began the slid down with Scotiabank dropping rates by a half point, from 13 per cent to 12.5 per cent, following the lead of First Citizens Bank the month before. At Republic Bank, monthly interest on credit cards was reduced to 2% per mo nth (or 24 %  per annum) from 2.1 % per month (25.2 % per annum).

• Global Finance, the New York-based international banking and finance publication, named Republic Bank the Best Emerging Market Bank for the fourth time in the last seven years.

• State-owned banking group First Citizens Bank officially acquired Port of Spain brokerage house CMMB. The deal which was signed in early May, made it the first publicly announced transaction related to Government’s cash rescue of the CL Financial group in return for a number of CL’s assets.

• A statement trom The Office of the Prime Minister said the Government had spent over half a billion dollars - $508m - to host the Fifth Summit of the Americas.

• One Caribbean Media (OCM) posted an after-tax profit of $89.6 million for 2008. For the first quarter ended March 31, 2009, however, the company reported a profit before tax of $13.3 million which was 33 per cent less than the $20 million recorded for the corresponding period last year.

• Unit Trust Corporation (UTC) reported 32 per cent growth for 2008 and an additional $520 million for the first quarter of 2009. This resulted in UTC investors benefiting from over $1 billion in distribution payments for last year.

• The Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago (CBTT) announced that  headline inflation had declined to 11.30 per cent  year-on-year in the month of March, from 11.70 per cent a month earlier.

• A TT$703 million (US$112 million)  deal was signed between Trinidad and Tobago and China for the construction of the controversial Alutrint smelter in Union Estate, La Brea which, when completed, should produce 250,000 tonnes of aluminum annually.

• TOSL Engineering Limited (TOSL) was assigned ratings of CariA+ (Foreign Currency Rating) and CariA+ (Local Currency Rating) to the US$10 million debt issue by Caribbean Information and Credit Rating Services Limited (CariCRIS), the regional credit rating agency.

• Energy Minister Conrad Enill disclosed that State-owned Petrotrin needs global crude oil price averages of at least US$68 a barrel in order to “survive”.

• African Ministers of Energy arrived in Trinidad on a personal invitation from Prime Minister Patrick Manning. The purpose of the visit was to provide African countries with advice and expertise for developing their local energy sector.

• The South Trinidad Chamber of Industry and Commerce signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Nigeria-based Port Harcourt Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (PHCCIMA). The three-year MoU seeks to promote trade, co-operation and investment relations between the two chambers.

JAMAICA

• AM Best revised its outlook to negative from stable for life insurer Sagicor Capital Life (Nassau) as well as its parent and sister companies. Jamaica’s sinking economy was blamed for the negative rating.

• The Capital & Credit Financial Group Limited (CCFG) recorded a net profit of $80.78 million for its first quarter ended March 31, 2009. The first quarter ‘09 profit is below the J$141.49 million profit recorded for the corresponding period in 2008.

• The Golding Government guaranteed a loan of €204.4 million from the Development Bank of Jamaica (DBJ) to the National Road Operating and Constructing Company (NROCC). Parliament approved the guarantee but only by government members following a walk-out by the Opposition People’s National Party (PNP).

• Jet Blue, the New York-based airline announced plans to open a route between New York to Kingston in five months. The airline also announced that beginning October, JetBlue it will serve Saint Lucia’s Hewanorra International Airport with three weekly flights out of New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport.

BARBADOS

• Cable Bahamas struck a deal to buy back, at a premium, the 6 million ordinary shares held by Barbados-based Columbus Communications. The agreement needs the approval of government regulators who will now determine they should block a move that could drain foreign currency reserves by as much as $80m.

• Butterfield Bank (Barbados) Limited (Butterfield) reported an increase of 17.1 per cent for the first quarter of 2009 over  the same period of 2008.

• Barbados signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on science and technology with Cuba. The MoU seeks to promote greater cooperation between the two countries.

• The Central Bank of Barbados lowered interest rates in an attempt to further boost economic activity. The Bank announced a reduction in the discount rate effective June 1, 2009.

GUYANA

• The government of Guyana secured €55 million (GY$14.575 billion) of grant financing to pursue development objectives.

• The April 2009 World Economic Outlook (WEO) which presents the International Monetary Fund (IMF) staff’s analysis and projections of economic developments projected that Guyana’s economy will grow by 2.6 per cent in 2009, and by 3.44 per cent in 2010.

OTHER REGIONAL

• Former US President Bill Clinton was appointed UN special envoy to Haiti as part of a strategy to help raise global awareness of the country’s plight as the poorest state in the Americas.

• US-based Alcoa World Alumina LLC announced that through its Surinamese subsidiary Suralco LLC, it will take over the bauxite and alumina refining interests of BHP-Billiton in Suriname. The deal is expected to be completed by the end of 2009.

• Leading multilateral development banks announced that they will increase their support to Latin America and the Caribbean by providing as much as US$90 billion during the next two years in a joint effort to spur economic growth in the region.

• The World Bank Board of Directors approved a US$500 million contingent line of credit to the Republic of Costa Rica to boost the country’s competitiveness and strengthen its public finances and respond to the global financial crisis.

• Energy exploration company, BPC Limited announced a new offshore joint venture with Norway’s StatoilHydro to launch the first major exploration project in Bahamian waters since 1986.

• Venezuela’s state oil company, PDVSA  said that it has taken control of 90 per cent of oil contractors on western Lake Maracaibo in its aim to reduce costs due to falling crude prices. Earlier, President Hugo Chavez announced that Venezuela is nationalizing 60 oil contractors as his government moves to assert control over the industry under a new law approved by the National Assembly.

Comments (0)

A tale of two marathons

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

The New York City Marathon and the London Marathon are two of the seven races which together comprise the World Marathon Majors. The other five are the Boston, Berlin and Chicago marathons and the IAAF World Championship and Olympic Games Marathon. Our writer, CHRIS CHRISTO follows the fortunes of two Trinidadian runners who packed their bags and braved unholy
temperatures to test themselves against the world’s best.

DATELINE:

39th New York City Marathon, New York,
November 2, 2008
No. STARTERS: 39,800

Alfred Patrick, left, and John Lum Young rest their tired muscles.

Alfred Patrick, left, and John Lum Young rest their tired muscles.

Brrrr! Marathon morning at Fort Wadsworth, Staten Island and  New York City is cold and windy.
At 6 degrees Celsius with the wind, Trinis Alfred Patrick and John Lum Young of Trinidad and Tobago Road Runners Club are chilly to the bone but ready for the adventure that had brought them to New York City in the dead of winter.
They arrive at the starting point fortified by a relaxing evening spent with training buddies from Canada and the United States, four of whom are also running NY for the first time. As usual, a high energy pre-race pasta dinner was on the menu. Afterwards, they had strolled to the world famous Times Square where, through a pre-arranged text message facility, the thousands of marathoners coming to New York could get their faces plastered across the mammoth ASICS electronic signboard. Some in the party had signed on and a cheer went up from the group as their faces lit up the screen,.  Yeah, that was cool!
Today, a record 39,800 runners representing 100 countries are at the starting point.
At 9:30 a.m. the race starts at the foot of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, the largest suspension bridge in the United States, with almost a mile run to the top that yields spectacular views of New York Harbor and the Manhattan skyline in the distance.
A 0.7-mile descent and the runners are into Brooklyn, the pavements thick with over a million cheering supporters lining  the 26.2-mile marathon course between the Bridge and the Central Park finish line.
Fourth Ave is a series of long inclines. Only now does the duo recognise the challenge that he New York Marathon is. Apart from bridges to overcome, there are repeated long inclines, some stretching for more than a mile.
Almost half the race is in Brooklyn through the neighbourhoods of Bayridge, Sunset Park, Park Slope, Boerum Hill, Clinton Hill, Williamsburg South, Williamsburg North and Greenpoint, not perfectly flat terrain.
Just past the 13-mile mark the athletes cross the Pulaski Bridge into Queens for a couple of miles; then it is on to the Queensboro Bridge over Roosevelt Island on the East River and into Manhattan.
A sharp right brings them onto First Avenue, around mile 16, then north all the way to Willis Avenue Bridge for The Bronx. Even this late into the race with the sun shining brightly, the temperature, at 9ºC, feels no warmer than at the start. The Trinis can’t seem to get the cold out of their system at all. In an odd way, the cold propels them forward out of fear that if they stop moving they could freeze. The gloves, hat and running thermal are of no help.
Before long comes Madison Bridge and then it’s back to Manhattan. Next looms Harlem. At Marcus Garvey Square they can almost smell the finish line, defined this morning as just another 4 miles to get out of the cold.
The fans are getting louder, urging all on to the finish. Soon they are running with Central Park on the right. Into the Park and a few more hills to that world-famous finish line by Tavern on the Green.
In the end,   38,096 of the starting 39,800 cross the finish line. Among them the two Trinis, Alfred Patrick and John Lum Young of the T&T Road Runners Club, and their North American friends.

DATELINE:

29th London Marathon,
England, April 26, 2009
No. STARTERS: 35, 747

After the thrill of London, Lum Young, right, and Patrick of T&T Road Runners Club.

After the thrill of London, Lum Young, right, and Patrick of T&T Road Runners Club.

It’s been five months and a half since the New York Marathon and the T&T Road Runners’ Alfred Patrick and John Lum Young are among the 35,000 runners warming up in Greenwich Park/ Blackheath awaiting the start of the London Marathon. The pair’s main mission: To qualify for another World Marathon major, the 2010 Boston Marathon.
The weather forecast calls for a day with occasional rain, gradually warming from 8ºC at 9:00 a.m. to 13ºC at noon and reaching a maximum of 16ºC by 3:00p.m.
With the memory of New York still frozen on their minds, Patrick and Lum Young are hoping that the outlook is wrong and that London will be kinder and warmer than cold, windy New York.
The London Marathon is a history tour by foot running, as it does, through some of the richest cultural and historical locations of a 2000 year-old city so steep in  tradition that it can be regulated by the conventions and practices under common law than by the book.
On this Sunday morning, Patrick and Lum Young are lucky. As they gear up for the 9:45 start there is not a cloud in the sky.  Already, the temperature is 12ºC and rising. The Trinidad duo know they must conserve energy to ensure they do not fade in the last eight miles. Ready… set…go! The runners head east to Woolwich before turning west to Greenwich via Charlton.
By mile 5, Lum Young is properly warmed up though 4 minutes behind what is required to make Boston. This is lost time that he will have to recoup inch by inch. Patrick, meanwhile, is in trouble. The ’flu of the past few days is making breathing difficult. But Patrick has travelled too far to give up easily. He holds the required pace.
The athletes pass in front of the Royal Naval College, designed by Christopher Wren the renowned 17th century architect whose best work was St Paul’s Cathedral. Since 1996 all military training had been transferred to Portsmouth with the premises now being used by the University of Greenwich and Trinity College of Music.
The competitors run around the Cutty Sark (last of the tea clippers to transport cargo between Britain and the Far East) and Gypsy Moth IV (on which 65 year old Francis Chichester, in 1966/67, became the first person to sail single-handedly around the world); both sailing boats are under restoration.
The rising temperature is bringing out the warmth and appreciation of Londoners who are out in full force, packing every inch of sidewalk and overpass, lustily cheering on the runners. Judging from the decibel, spectators’ voices are sure to be as sore as the runners’ legs by the end of this race.
Leaving Greenwich the race moves through the working class districts of Deptford, Rotherhithe and Bermondsey, then north across Tower Bridge, alongside the Tower of London (as famous for its 125 executions over the centuries, as for its housing of the Crown Jewels), before turning east.
By midway in the race (mile 13.1) Lum Young has retrieved two of the lost four minutes but things are not getting better for  Patrick who, under pressure of the ’flu, begins to change strategy in order to complete the race. For him, making the cut for Boston is no longer the priority; survival is the only goal.
Lum Young presses on through Limehouse, then south through Isle of Dogs to Island Gardens, the river bank opposite Greenwich. Up to the 1960s, these 8.5 square miles of modern office complexes, housing and other community infrastructure had been derelict wharves, victims of the change to container ships requiring deeper ports.
The race turns north to Poplar, criss-crossing the scenic waterfronts at Crossharbour, South Quay and Heron Quay. At Canary Wharf (mile 19) runners know the halfway mark, in terms of effort, is nigh. Many will begin to tire, a few will be overcome by exhaustion and others will have to dig deep to keep their goals in sight. Lum Young is on target. Can he do it?
A pack of runners keep the pace steady as the bunch turns west, back through Limehouse, towards the City of London. A lion on either side of the road marks the entrance to this tiny business district of roughly one square mile.
William the Conqueror, the Norman invader who defeated Saxon England in 1066, never captured the City of London, shrewdly recognising that merchants were better at generating the wealth to finance his battles. In 1067 he granted a charter to the Mayor of London allowing the City to retain the privileges enjoyed under Saxon rule. The convention endures to this day: If the Queen wants to enter the City, the Mayor has  to be advised in advance to avoid any awkward misinterpretation of the monarch’s presence.
As they pass mile 23 many athletes are slowing but Lum Young holds steady as he hits London Bridge. This is the bridge that replaced the original London Bridge that had been bought by the Americans- although it is widely believed by the British that the Americans thought they had really bought Tower Bridge.
So far so good. Next come Blackfriars, named after the colour of the habits worn by friars of the Dominican Order. A monastery stood here for 3 centuries until 1538 when Henry VIII severed links with the Roman Catholic Church and began the campaign to establish the Church of England.
Not too far again. Dig! Past Cleopatra’s Needle, a 65ft high granite obelisk carved about 1475 BC in Egypt, now stands on the banks of the Thames. The London Eye towers on the opposite bank.
Mile 25: very close now, set small goals. Hold that pace to Westminster. There is Big Ben (actually St Stephen’s Tower). Almost there! Concentrate!
Soon comes St James’s Park and Birdcage Walk (so called because the Royal Aviaries once lined one side of the road). Five hundred metres, give it all! Buckingham Palace, 200m to go.
At the finish line Lum Young is ecstatic. He has made the cut for Boston! Patrick achieves his new goal by also crossing The Mall finish line. Road Runners celebrate.

Comments (0)

THE NAKED TRUTH

Posted on 01 June 2009 by admin

EARL BEST listens in on Gayle’s recent comments

West Indies captain Chris Gayle

West Indies captain Chris Gayle

If the dictionary says a “somnambulist” is someone who walks in his sleep and a “somniloquist” is someone who talks in his sleep, what does one call someone who walks and talks in his sleep? On the dictionary model, probably a “somniloquambulist.” So then, what does one call someone who puts his foot in his mouth and then walks and talks in his sleep? The dictionary is of little assistance here but if you are a West Indian cricket fan you do not need to consult it because the answer is easy to find. It’s “Chris Gayle.”
Last month, as his West Indian side took on England in the hastily arranged two-Test, three-ODI short series,  the brutally frank West Indian captain who usually prefers to let his bat do the talking, hit the headlines for actions that had occurred beyond the boundary. Twice. First, Gayle set the tongues wagging when he decided to extend his stay in the Indian Premier League to play an “extra” game for his Kolkata Knight Riders and so arrive in England to join his team a mere two days before the start of the First Test at Lord’s.  Immediately, out came the long knives. From almost every quarter. In the Express, Tony Cozier pointedly ended his report on the skipper’s move by reminding readers that Gayle had made US$1million the Stanford Twenty/20 for 20m one-off match in November and another US$700,000 when he signed for the IPL. The message was clear: money was the name of the game. And as far as I am aware, the quixotic captain found neither a Sancho Panza to ride at his side nor a shield or buckler raised to defend him. Everyone, including former West Indies captain, coach and administrator Clive Lloyd and England captain Andrew Strauss, seemed quite shocked that, on the evidence of the choice he had made, the skipper’s priorities were what they seemed to be. The Test game, after all, as every cricketer in his right mind knows, is infinitely more important that any of its offspring. You would have to be quite crazy to suggest, in word or in deed, that any of the other formats of the game that were spawned by the Test parent could take precedence over the latter. Particularly if you happened to be the captain of your country’s Test team.
To the resultant injury, Gayle added personal and collective insult, Strauss’ England, bent on vengeance, needing a mere three days to force the West Indian cavaliers into ignominious submission at Lord’s by the margin of ten wickets. The skipper’s contribution? In the first innings 28, in the second an 11-ball duck and a crucial dropped catch into the bargain when England batted. The deed was done and the matter might just have rested there. But no one said as much to the hard-hitting Jamaican opener who had been catapulted into the hot seat of the captaincy by a concatenation of events well outside of his control in 2007. And Gayle, perhaps mistakenly concluding that actions always speak louder than words, opened his mouth and spoke to a London Guardian reporter.
In the exclusive interview, Gayle had this unfortunate comment to make on the issue of the threat posed to the survival of Test cricket by the growing popularity of the Twenty20 game: “I wouldn’t be so sad (to see it die.) I like Twenty20 since it come about now. I like it. Who doesn’t?”
And on the matter of the leadership of the Caribbean side, he is reported to have said that he “might give it up … I will be giving it up shortly … It’s definitely not something I’m looking to hang on to. I need some time for myself, to be honest with you. It’s a lot of travelling. There’s always something you have to go and do, you know, extra, lunch or dinner, some other thing; there’s always something for the captain. I’m not that type of person. I can’t take on too much things. So, soon I will be handing over this captaincy. I’ll soon finish with it.”
Perhaps understandably, out came the long knives again. No one quite said it in those terms but you had a sense that all were asking how dare he bite the hand that feeds him? Where would he be without Test cricket? Clive Lloyd could remain silent this time as two of the other three cricketing knights, Sir Gary Sobers and Sir Viv Richards, jumped into the fray to defend the progenitor. Sobers, the game’s greatest all-rounder, whose 8,032 Test runs came in 160 innings at an average of 57.78, conceded that it had never been his lot to choose between the prestige-riddled international game and the cash-rich short forms. He, however, expressed confidence that he would not have hesitated to opt for Tests. “I have not been in this position,” he said. “If I was in that situation, I would try to combine both forms of the game of cricket. And if I could not do that, then I would feel that Test cricket would remain the top priority. It would not be an easy decision to make.”
Richards, who scored 8,540 runs in 121 Tests and 6721 in 187 ODI’s, never challenged Gayle’s right to hold dissenting views but wondered whether he had not perhaps misrepresented his position somewhat.  “Everyone has their opinion,” Richards said, “and Chris has expressed his. I believe that Test cricket is the pinnacle. He must remember that he made the West Indies team not because he was a good Twenty20 player but because of his ability as a Test cricketer. He seems to have forgotten that the One-day games came out of Test cricket and it was Test cricket which brought him to the world’s attention.”
Perhaps responding directly to those comments, Gayle made the germane comment that many of the so-called icons had not known what it was to lose – Sobers did, especially as captain – and so any assessment of their judgments should be made with that in mind. For me, that is not what he needed to say. For me, the real issue here is the essential hypocrisy of much of what passes for comment in the media. It seems to me that we have to ask whether or not, finding themselves in Gayle’s situation, Sobers and Richards would have acted differently from the way the Jamaican did. Both need to ask themselves that question and to ask themselves as well whether player attitudes to Test cricket would have remained the same assuming the earning potential for each of the different forms was what it is today and the relative demands on their time were unchanged.
Another question that has to be asked is this: To what extent are Richards and Sobers (and Lloyd and Strauss earlier on) merely giving the knee-jerk response expected if not required of high profile personalities and declining to confront a harsh, uncomfortable truth? Put another way, isn’t Gayle’s sin here, like the child in the Grimms’ story, trying to force us all to admit what we knew all along but could not quite summon up the courage to say publicly, to blurt out that the emperor is wearing no clothes? And yet another question might be this:  What, when you get right down to it, is the real objection to Gayle’s comments? Is it that they are inaccurate or merely inopportune? Would the reaction have been the same had he said what he did between series, for example, or at the end of the series in the West Indies when he and not Strauss had the Wisden Trophy in his hand?
In my view, had Gayle carried on from where he started in the second innings at Chester-le-Street and converted his 54 into a (preferably unbeaten) century, his detractors would have had pie all over their faces.  A Test match is played, an insightful commentator once said, in the minds of the captains. That means that the test of the captain’s commitment to the task is not so much what he says as what he does, especially within the boundary ropes. Whether or not Gayle’s faith in the future of the game is shaky, he must find it within himself to give his all once the coin has been tossed and the die cast. If he cannot, then he has no choice but to give up the mantle. Like Richards, I do not think Gayle will. I do not think that he really worries about the weight of the cares of the captaincy; it is not in his nature. In my view, Gayle’s real beef is echoed in the comments of WIPA boss, Dinanath Ramnarine.
Commenting on the report that Gayle might soon be retiring from Test cricket, Ramnarine told a Cricinfo reporter that he believed that “the relentless scheduling by money-hungry boards will force an increasing number of players to choose one form of the game.”
“I think something like [Gayle’s situation] is going to basically find itself happening to all other players,” he said. “The shorter form of the game is far more lucrative than the longer version of the game. At the end of the day, as an international player, you have a certain timeframe in which you play cricket. People have their families that they would like to spend time with but you’re playing cricket 12 months of the year. (…) What’s going to happen is players are going to choose. I don’t think this is just a message for Chris (Gayle) alone. The ICC and the governing bodies must recognise that there needs to be a structure and they can’t be the ones who are just concerned with making as much money as possible.”
Let us not forget that the just ended series was not on the Future Tours listing. It was the result of an eleventh-hour agreement struck between the WICB and the ECB with no prior consultation with WIPA or the players. The “structure” was ignored and once that happens, Ramnarine and Gayle are saying, there is going to be a price to pay. In 2009, that price was high: the absence of key all-rounder Dwayne Bravo, the late arrival of the captain in England and, ultimately, the loss of the Wisden Trophy.
And really, it is not hard to accept that the tourists, who arrived with the freshly won silverware in their luggage, would leave without it. Bravo or no Bravo, Gayle or no Gayle, from the outset of the tour, all the assets, all the trumps seemed to be with the hosts. Everything pointed to a convincing England win, the English needing to avenge the completely unexpected 1-0 beating in the Caribbean, the inexperience of the West Indian squad, the poverty of the bowling resources, the heavy dependence of the batting on a handful of players and, perhaps most important most of all, the weather.
Tony Cozier has over and over again documented the West Indian cricketers’ dislike of environments where the sun is not on their backs. And the current tour began in early May, earlier than the domestic English cricket season. On the afternoon of the First Test when Ravi Bopara and Stuart Broad put together a relatively big 69-run partnership to rescue their team from a shaky 192 for 5, it was thanks to no fewer than six dropped catches, four off Broad and two off Bopara. All the commentators called attention to the devastating effect of those lapses on Fidel Edwards made manifest in body language. The afternoon temperature hovered around 18 degrees, as much fun for a West Indian cricketer as an April swim in the Mediterranean. And the team’s body language said it in unequivocal tones, that day and on virtually every one of the six playing days thereafter. When they were in the field, you rarely saw the players looking as if they wanted to be there, except of course occasionally immediately after the fall of a wicket. Who could be surprised then that, despite the loss of an entire day at Chester-le-Street, the eventual result was an innings defeat, translating into a 0-2 series loss. One expects that there would have been a similar whitewash in the three one-dayers if the weather had not intervened to ruin the first one on May 21.
So what does all that mean for the turnaround that some thought they had perceived at the end of the series in the Caribbean? Well, it means that the turnaround continues. If Gayle makes good on his promise and goes – God forbid – we shall be back to square one. Chanderpaul has already shown that he cannot cut it and Sarwan seems uninterested in the position. Bereft of the burdens, he continues to thrive as batsman, having taken his Test tally to 15 centuries with his solid 100 in the first innings of the Second Test, his 81st. So who can blame him? That leaves us realistically with two options, the pair who have served as the deputy, the 25-year-old Bravo and the 24-year-old Denesh Ramdin. Neither seems quite ready for the challenge of captaincy, Ramdin still not having delivered on the promise of his early batting, and his Trinidad and Tobago teammate, for all his enthusiasm and achievement, still discovering himself, one feels. But two tests and three ODI’s against Bangladesh are on the cards next month and one feels that we will be ready for them no matter who is at the helm.
So Gayle has to be persuaded to stay on, at least temporarily. The immediate assignment is Australia and Sri Lanka in Group C of the Twenty20 World Cup in England next week, followed by the redoubtable Indians for a series of four ODIs in the Caribbean at month’s end. If we manage to hold our own in these encounters, I think we can reasonably expect the incumbent to let the public know - at least, by his silence - whether or not we have to look for new shoulders on which to place the mantle of West Indian cricketing leadership.

Comments (0)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

TT Review Calendar

June 2009
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930